Academia Open
Vol 6 (2022): June
Law

Non-compliance with the Constitutional Court's Decision from the Perspective of Constitutional Law
Ketidakpatuhan terhadap PutusanMahkamah Konstitusi dari Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara


View Article
Similarity Check Result
  • Narwoko,
  • Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy*,
  • Abdul Fatah
Narwoko
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Bio
Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *
Bio
Abdul Fatah
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Bio

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.6.2022.677
Published June 30, 2022
Keywords
  • constitutional court decision,
  • disobedience,
  • manpower
How to Cite
Narwoko, Phahlevy, R. R., & Fatah, A. (2022). Non-compliance with the Constitutional Court’s Decision from the Perspective of Constitutional Law . Academia Open, 6, 10.21070/acopen.6.2022.677. https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.6.2022.677

Copyright (c) 2022 Narwoko, Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study aims to determine the forms of non-compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision regarding Manpower and to find a constitutional solution to the problem of non-compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision regarding Manpower.This research is a juridicial normative study using a statutory, case, and conseptual approach.Using legal materials in the form of a Constitutional Court Decision related to Manpower.From the research results, it can be concluded that the Constitutional Court Decision regarding Manpower are not obeyed by the adressats. Various forms of non-compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision regarding Manpower-related Laws were not followed up and partially fulfilled in the form of government policies such as the Regulation of Minister of Manpower, Circular of the Minister of Manpower. Some laws are in the legislative process. The constitutional solution that has the potential to realized for non-compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision is the implementation of the concept of judicial order, judicial defferal, and imposition of sanctions.

View Article
Similarity Check Result

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. A. F. Hadjar, Pokok-Pokok Pikiran dan Rancangan Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: KRHN dan Kemitraan, 2003.
  2. P. M. Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011.
  3. T. Triwulan Tutik, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pascaamandemen UUD 1945. Jakarta: Cerdas Pustaka, 2008.
  4. I. Samsul, “Laporan Akhir Pengkajian Hukum Tentang Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi,” Jakarta, 2009.
  5. F. Laksono, W. Wijayanti, A. Triningsih, and N. Mardiya, “Implikasi dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 5/PUU-X/2012 Tentang SBI atau RSBI,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 731–760, 2013.
  6. J. Asshiddiqie and M. A. Safa’at, Theory Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum, 1st ed. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal & Kepaniteraan Makamah Konstitusi RI, 2006.
  7. M. Farida Indrati, Ilmu Perundang-Undangan (1) (Jenis, Fungsi, Materi Muatan). Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2007.
  8. B. Manan, Teori dan Politik Konstitusi, 2nd ed. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2004.
  9. Kepaniteraan dan Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi, “Laporan Tahunan MK RI Tahun 2019,” Jakarta, 2020.
  10. T. Sulistyowati, M. I. Nasef, and A. Ridho, “Constitutional Compliance atas Putusan MK oleh Lembaga Negara,” Jakarta, 2019.
  11. Bisariyadi, “Politik Penundaan Pelaksanaan Putusan Atas Nama Demokrasi,” Majalah Konstitusi, Jakarta, 2017.
  12. A. Syahrizal, “Problem Implementasi Putusan MK,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 4, no. 1, 2007.