Vol 20 (2022): October
Education Policy

Analysis of the Family Hope Program
Analisis Program Keluarga Harapan


Novy Arthamevia
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Hendra Sukmana
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published September 9, 2022
Keywords
  • Hope Family Program,
  • Public policy
How to Cite
Arthamevia, N., & Sukmana, H. (2022). Analysis of the Family Hope Program. Indonesian Journal of Public Policy Review, 20, 10.21070/ijppr.v20i0.1250. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijppr.v20i0.1250

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze the family of hope program along with the obstacles in the family of hope program in Sidoarjo Regency. This research is based on the problem of assistants who carry out socialization only once every three months and there are still many PKH recipients who do not understand their rights and obligations. The research method used is qualitative research. The data collection technique is by means of in-depth interviews, observations and relevant literature studies with one key informant, namely the Village PKH assistant and four supporting informants including the District PKH coordinator, village secretary, and PKH assistance recipient communities. The analysis technique in this study uses a qualitative type that refers to the theory of Miles and Huberman. The results showed that the analysis of the family of hope program in Sidoarjo, namely, first, the achievement of goals. The achievement measure is said to have not been achieved because the targets for accepting PKH members are still not on target and the process of managing the aid index for PKH recipients is still not right. The second is integration, the size of integration is said to be not right because there has been no delivery of skills for PKH members in socializing with PKH facilitators. Third, adaptation, PKH facilitators are quite good and can adapt to PKH members and their environment.

Keywords – ; 

References

  1. Suharno. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Kebijakan Publik. Yogyaarta: UNY Press.
  2. Sarman, M dan Sagogyo. (2000). Masalah Penanggulangan Kemiskinan. Jakarta: Puspa Swara
  3. Winanro, B. (2017). Teori dan Proses Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo
  4. Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R Dan D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  5. Meleong. (2012). Metdologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Cetakan Dua Puluh (Edisi Revisi) Oktober 2007. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  6. Bungin, B. (2012). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  7. Miles, B. M. (2014). Data Kualitatif Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Jakarta: UIP.
  8. Siagian, S. P. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Binapura Aksara.
  9. Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2009 dan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 15 Tahun 2010 tentang Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan
  10. Saputra, Y., & Sujianto, S. (2017). Pengelolaan Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) di Kecamatan Tembilahan Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir (Doctoral dissertation, Riau University).
  11. Rahayu, R., Kusrin, K., & Purnamasari, H. (2021). Program Keluarga Harapan Dalam Upaya Pengentasan Kemiskinan Di Kecamatan Cibuaya Kabupaten Karawang. Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 8(1), 192-207.
  12. Najidah, N., & Lestari, H. (2019). Efektivitas Program Keluarga Harapan (Pkh) Di Kelurahan Rowosari Kecamatan Tembalang Kota Semarang. Journal of Public Policy and Management Review, 8(2), 69-87.
  13. Lestari, D. S., & Sukmana, H. (2020). Analysis of the Family Hope Program in Sidoarjo Regency. Indonesian Journal of Public Policy Review, 9, 10-21070.