Vol 21 (2023): January
Public Policy

Analysis of the Quality of Public Services in the Administrative Sector in Regency
Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Pada Bidang Administrasi di Kabupaten


Ria Syaidatul Umaroh
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Hendra Sukmana
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published November 15, 2022
Keywords
  • Administrative Services,
  • Quality
How to Cite
Umaroh, R. S., & Sukmana, H. (2022). Analysis of the Quality of Public Services in the Administrative Sector in Regency. Indonesian Journal of Public Policy Review, 21, 10.21070/ijppr.v21i0.1291. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijppr.v21i0.1291

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze and describe the quality of public services in the field of administration in Sidoarjo Regency. In this research, there are problems regarding service quality, including village government officials who cannot master computers, village officials who are not disciplined in carrying out their duties. The method used in this research is a descriptive qualitative research method. Data collection techniques were carried out by interview, observation, and documentation with one key informant, namely the head of service in Medalem Village and seven supporting informants. The data analysis technique in this study uses the theory of Miles and Huberman which includes data collection, data reduction, data presentation, as well as drawing conclusions and verification. The results of the study indicate that administrative services are not complicated and the service process is not too long and is supported by adequate facilities and infrastructure. However, there are still Medalem Village government officials who often arrive late. In addition, there are still apparatuses who cannot master computers and there are those who do not master computers and the applications used in serving the community. Services in Medalem Village have not been supported by a place for complaints for the community which is useful for the government to know more about the shortcomings in its performance and what the needs of the community are.

References

  1. Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik
  2. Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pedoman Standar Pelayanan
  3. Yusuf, A. M. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penelitian Gabungan. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
  4. Djaman satori, A. K. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  5. KemenPan No. 63 Tahun 2003 yang menjelaskan tentang standar pelayanan publik
  6. Armando Mailantang, R. G. 2018. Kinerja Aparatur Pemerintah Desa Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik di Desa Batumbalango dan Ensem Kecamatan Essang Selatan Kabupaten Kepulauan Talaud. Jurnal Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan 1(1), 1-11.
  7. Parasuraman, A, Valerie A. Zeithaml, Leonard L. Berry. 1998 SERVQUAL : A Multiple Item ScaleFor Measuring Consumer Perception Of Service Quality. Journal Of Retailing Vol. 64No. 1, pp 12-37.
  8. Robyardi, E. (2017). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Bukti Fisik Terhadap Kepuasan Nasabah Kantor Cabang Rivai Bank Rakyat Indonesia Palembang. Jurnal Media Wahan Ekonomika, 14(1), 1-12.
  9. Along, A. (2020). Kualitas Layanan Administrasi Akademik di Politeknik Negeri Pontianak. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 6(1), 1-6.
  10. KemenPan No 58 Tahun 2002 Tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Penilaian dan Penghargaan Citra Pelayanan Prima Sebagai Unit